<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shaw Development v. Southern Builders: America&#8217;s First Green Building Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2008/11/shawvsouthernlitigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2008/11/shawvsouthernlitigation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=shawvsouthernlitigation</link>
	<description>Current issues in sustainable building law for owners, builders, and design professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Building: Incentives &#38; Mandates &#124; Konstructr</title>
		<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2008/11/shawvsouthernlitigation/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Building: Incentives &#38; Mandates &#124; Konstructr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/?p=95#comment-908</guid>
		<description>[...] for someone else to blame. As noted in several recent situations such as the DC Green Building Act, Shaw Development vs. Southern Builders, or most recently, Pittsburgh, PA, green building policy is meant to encourage natural resource [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for someone else to blame. As noted in several recent situations such as the DC Green Building Act, Shaw Development vs. Southern Builders, or most recently, Pittsburgh, PA, green building policy is meant to encourage natural resource [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

