<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008: Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Tax Deduction Extended Through 2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2008/12/energy-efficient-commercial-buildings-tax-deduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2008/12/energy-efficient-commercial-buildings-tax-deduction/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=energy-efficient-commercial-buildings-tax-deduction</link>
	<description>Current issues in sustainable building law for owners, builders, and design professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and Green Building &#171; Ewanski GBS Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2008/12/energy-efficient-commercial-buildings-tax-deduction/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and Green Building &#171; Ewanski GBS Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/?p=163#comment-553</guid>
		<description>[...] Stephen&#8217;s Blog Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stephen&#8217;s Blog Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Ewanski</title>
		<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2008/12/energy-efficient-commercial-buildings-tax-deduction/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Ewanski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/?p=163#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Stephen, Great post! I can&#039;t wait to read more about a few of the future connected blog posts that you hinted were coming:

- &quot;Note the significant implications here of how a tenant’s lease is structured in terms of whether it will choose to make any qualifying expenditures- I will discuss much more about this critical issue in subsequent posts here at GRELJ.&quot;

- &quot;...note the potential professional liability insurance policy implications for design professionals who make this certification absent sufficient protective language in their agreements with the taxpayer.&quot;

I&#039;m new to this law as you saw on my blog/twitter and I am trying to understand it. Really understand it. Not just cut and paste the text onto my blog and let everyone else try and figure it out. So, thanks for this clarification and hope to read these other parts soon.

Best,
Patricia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, Great post! I can&#8217;t wait to read more about a few of the future connected blog posts that you hinted were coming:</p>
<p>- &#8220;Note the significant implications here of how a tenant’s lease is structured in terms of whether it will choose to make any qualifying expenditures- I will discuss much more about this critical issue in subsequent posts here at GRELJ.&#8221;</p>
<p>- &#8220;&#8230;note the potential professional liability insurance policy implications for design professionals who make this certification absent sufficient protective language in their agreements with the taxpayer.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to this law as you saw on my blog/twitter and I am trying to understand it. Really understand it. Not just cut and paste the text onto my blog and let everyone else try and figure it out. So, thanks for this clarification and hope to read these other parts soon.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Patricia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

