<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Antitrust Implications of Green Building Legislation (Abstract)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2010/01/the-antitrust-implications-of-green-building-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2010/01/the-antitrust-implications-of-green-building-legislation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-antitrust-implications-of-green-building-legislation</link>
	<description>Current issues in sustainable building law for owners, builders, and design professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Study: Lack of FSC-Certified Wood Products Creating Green Construction "Bottleneck" in New York &#124; Green Real Estate Law Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2010/01/the-antitrust-implications-of-green-building-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>Study: Lack of FSC-Certified Wood Products Creating Green Construction "Bottleneck" in New York &#124; Green Real Estate Law Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/?p=480#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>[...] study is a timely addition to the antitrust aspects of the debate &#8211; which we&#8217;ve noted previously here at GRELJ - as USGBC reviews the most recent public comments to the proposed revisions to MR-7. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] study is a timely addition to the antitrust aspects of the debate &#8211; which we&#8217;ve noted previously here at GRELJ &#8211; as USGBC reviews the most recent public comments to the proposed revisions to MR-7. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Del Percio</title>
		<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2010/01/the-antitrust-implications-of-green-building-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Del Percio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/?p=480#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Tim. For all of the state and local governments that have incorporated LEED in some capacity into legislation, I think, right now, it would be difficult for a non-FSC manufacturer to demonstrate proof of market effect under the test set forth in &lt;em&gt;Allied Tube&lt;/em&gt;. It&#039;s an interesting analogy, though, that could become more serious as legislative activity continues and USGBC&#039;s review of MR-7 proceeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Tim. For all of the state and local governments that have incorporated LEED in some capacity into legislation, I think, right now, it would be difficult for a non-FSC manufacturer to demonstrate proof of market effect under the test set forth in <em>Allied Tube</em>. It&#8217;s an interesting analogy, though, that could become more serious as legislative activity continues and USGBC&#8217;s review of MR-7 proceeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy R. Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/2010/01/the-antitrust-implications-of-green-building-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy R. Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenrealestatelaw.com/?p=480#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Definitely an interesting issue.  It will get a lot more interesting as localities step into the pothole of requiring LEED specifically as opposed to parallel equivalent systems.

On a grander note, I hope the USGBC can overcome the underlying threshold question which is the FSC process ... I hear it can be quite cost-prohibitive for smaller players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely an interesting issue.  It will get a lot more interesting as localities step into the pothole of requiring LEED specifically as opposed to parallel equivalent systems.</p>
<p>On a grander note, I hope the USGBC can overcome the underlying threshold question which is the FSC process &#8230; I hear it can be quite cost-prohibitive for smaller players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

